Topics
Abstract
Asexuality is usually seen as not enough intimate attraction. Research in asexuality expanded progressively within the previous two years. But, asexuals’ patterns of intimate behavior and processes that are psychological perhaps not yet systematized. This review sought out articles that may possibly assist developing these habits. Articles posted in English until 31st 2019 were retrieved from Medline, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycARTICLES december. A search that is systematic conducted utilizing an exhaustive directory of terms regarding asexuality and sexual behavior after PRISMA instructions. Regarding the 195 initially retrieved, just 23 were considered because of this review. Associated with 23 articles, 16 had been quantitative studies, 5 had been qualitative studies, and 2 quantitative that is comprised qualitative studies. Overall, present findings claim that asexuals present great heterogeneity of sexual actions and emotional procedures sexuality that is regarding including different factors and kinds of social and intimate relationships, sexual attitudes or dreams. Conversely, information would not find support for the declare that asexuals present impaired sexual functioning. The tiny geographical and social variety for the examples is just a limitation that is major these studies, steering clear of the properly representation of asexuals. Additionally, asexuals may reap the benefits of pr f in the biopsychosocial facets shaping intimate, psychological, and relationship wellbeing, so far as such evidence is created upon asexuals’ lenses, instead of on heteronormativity requirements.
Access choices
Contribute to Journal
Get complete log access for 12 months
just 30,26 € per issue
All costs are web prices. VAT will be added later on into the checkout.Tax calculation will likely to be finalised during checkout.
Lease or Purchase article
Get time restricted or full article access on ReadCube.
All costs are web costs.
Recommendations
Bogaert AF. Asexuality exactly what it really is and just why it matters. J Sex Res. 2015;52 362–79.
Brotto LA, Knudson G, Inskip J, Rhodes K, Erskine Y. Asexuality a mixed-methods approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39 599–618.
Bogaert AF, Ashton MC, Lee K. Personality and orientation that is sexual extension to asexuality while the HEXACO model. J Sex Res. 2018;55 951–61.
Brotto LA, Yule MA. Asexuality intimate orientation, paraphilia, intimate disorder, or none regarding the above? Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46 619–27.
Greaves LM, Barlow FK, Huang Y, Stronge S, Fraser G, Sibley CG. Asexual identity in a fresh Zealand sample that is national demographics, well-being, and wellness. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2017;46 2417–27.
Rosario M, Schrimshaw EW. Theories and etiologies of intimate orientation. In Tolman DL, Diamond LM, editors. APA Handb k of psychology and sexuality. 1 Person-based approaches United states Psychological Association; 2014.
Gressgård R. Asexuality from pathology to identification and past. Psychol Sexuality. 2013;4 179–92.
AVEN. The Asexual Visibility & Education System Overview 2020. asexuality /?q=overview.html.
Kinsey AC, Martin CE, Pomeroy WB. Intimate behavior within the individual male. Philadelphia, PA WB Saunders Company; 1948.
Bogaert AF. Asexuality prevalence and associated factors in a probability sample that is national. J Sex Res. 2004;41 279–87.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH. Sexual behavior into the female that is human. Philadelphia, PA WB Saunders Company; 1953.
Brotto Los Angeles, Yule MA, Gorzalka BB. Asexuality an variant that is extreme of desire condition? J Intercourse Med. 2015;12 646–60.
Prause N, Graham CA. Asexuality category and characterization. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2007;36 341–56.
United States Psychiatric Association. Sexual dysfunctions. Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychological disorders (DSM-5 В® ). Washington, DC American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
Yule MA, Brotto LA, Gorzalka BB. Psychological state and functioning that is interpersonal self-identified asexual people. Psychol Sex. 2013;4 136–51.
Gupta K. So what does asexuality teach us about intimate disinterest? Suggestions for health care professionals centered on a study that is qualitative asexually identified individuals. J Intercourse Marital Ther. 2017;43 1–14.
Van Houdenhove E, Enzlin P, Gijs L. a confident approach toward asexuality some very first steps, but nonetheless quite a distance to get. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46 647–51.
Dawson M, McDonnell L, Scott S. Negotiating the boundaries of closeness the non-public life of asexual people. Sociol Rev. 2016;64 349–65.
Yule MA, Brotto Los Angeles, Gorzalka BB. Intimate masturbation and fantasy among asexual individuals. could J Hum Sexuality. 2014;23 89–95.
Yule MA, Brotto Los Angeles, Gorzalka BB. Sexual fantasy and masturbation among asexual people an in-depth research. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2017;46 311–28.
Bulmer M, Izuma K. Implicit and attitudes that are explicit intercourse and love in asexuals. J Sex Res. 2018;55 962–74.
Carrigan M. There’s more to life than intercourse? Difference and commonality inside the asexual community. Sexualities. 2011;14 462–78.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Favored items that are reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses the PRISMA declaration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151 264–9.
Zheng L, Su Y. Patterns ofM asexuality in china intercourse, sexual and intimate attraction, and desire that is sexual. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2018;47 1265–76.
Aicken CR, Mercer CH, Cassell JA. Who states lack of intimate attraction in Britain? Evidence from nationwide likelih d surveys. Psychol Sex. 2013;4 121–35.
Fu T-c, Herbenick D, Dodge B, Owens C, Sanders SA, Reece M, et al. Relationships among sexual identification, intimate attraction, and intimate behavior outcomes from the nationally representative likelih d test of adults in the us. Arch Sexual Behav. 2018 1–11.
Rothblum ED, Krueger EA, Kittle KR, Meyer IH. Asexual and non-asexual participants from a us population-based research of intimate minorities. Arch Sexual Behav. 2019 1–11.
Scherrer KS. Arriving at an asexual identification negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities. 2008;11 621–41.
Nobre PJ, Pinto‐Gouveia J. Dysfunctional beliefs that are sexual vulnerability facets for intimate disorder. J Sex Res. 2006;43 68–75.
Carvalho J, Lemos D 
Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitive and psychological predictors of feminine sexual dysfunctions preliminary findings. J Intercourse Marital Ther. 2008;34 325–42.
Carvalho J, Nobre P. Biopsychosocial determinants of men’s sexual interest testing an integrative model. J Intercourse Med. 2011;8 754–63.
Petty RE, Briñol P, DeMarree KG. The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes implications for mindset dimension, modification, and strength. Soc Cogn. 2007;25 657–86.
Greenwald the, Banaji M. Implicit social cognition attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev. 1995;102 4.
Dosch the, Belayachi S, Van, der Linden M. Implicit and explicit sexual attitudes exactly how will they be linked to desire that is intimate sexual satisfaction in both women and men. J Sex Res. 2016;53 251–64.
Bogaert AF. Asexuality and autochorissexualism (identity-less sex). Arch Intercourse Behav. 2012;41 1513–4.
Bancroft J, Janssen E, Intense D, Vukadinovic Z. The connection between sexuality and m d in gay guys. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32 231–42.
Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Longer JS. The relation between m d and sex in heterosexual males. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2003;32 217–30.
Bancroft J, Vukadinovic Z. Sexual addiction, intimate compulsivity, intimate impulsivity, or exactly what? Toward a model that is theoretical. J Sex Res. 2004;41 225–34.
Reid RC, Garos S, Carpenter BN. Reliability, credibility, and development that is psychometric of Hypersexual Behavior Inventory in a outpatient test of males. Intercourse Addiction Compulsivity. 2011;18 30–51.
Spector internet protocol address, Carey MP, Steinberg L. The Sexual want Inventory development, element framework, and pr f of reliability. J Intercourse Marital Ther. 1996;22 175–90.
